Educational Information

Common Mistakes in Bug Reporting and How to Avoid Them

Write effective bug reports and avoid common mistakes like vagueness and missing metadata. Learn practical tips and see real examples.

Bug reporting is one of the most critical stages in the software development lifecycle. It acts as the direct communication between testers, QA engineers, and developers, ensuring the smooth resolution of glitches that could otherwise derail a project. Yet, reporting bugs effectively isn't always as straightforward as it seems. 

Mistakes in bug reporting can lead to delays, miscommunication, and even unsolved issues, frustrating everyone involved. If you're a QA engineer, software tester, or developer, this blog will walk you through the common mistakes in bug reporting—and how to avoid them. By the end, you'll be equipped with actionable tips to help you write clearer, more effective bug reports that drive faster resolution. 

 Why Are Bug Reporting Mistakes a Problem? 

Imagine you’ve been assigned to fix a bug, and the report simply says, “The app isn’t working.” What does that even mean? Is the app crashing? Is there an issue with performance? Or is a specific feature malfunctioning? 

A poorly written bug report can slow down progress, wasting time as developers attempt to clarify the issue and dig for key details. Worse, crucial bugs may go unresolved if reports lack enough context or clarity for prioritization. Avoiding common mistakes upfront makes bug reporting smoother and accelerates the entire development workflow.

 Common Bug Reporting Mistakes 

1. Vague Descriptions 

  • The Problem: A vague or overly general description (“The app doesn’t load”, “The button doesn’t work”) doesn’t provide enough context for developers to reproduce and address the issue. It leaves too much room for ambiguity. 
  • The Impact: Developers waste precious time retracing vague steps, or worse, fixing the bug incorrectly because they misunderstood the description. 

2. Missing Steps to Reproduce 

  • The Problem: Without a clear, step-by-step walkthrough, developers can struggle to recreate the problem. This is particularly true for intermittent bugs, which aren’t always evident on first try. 
  • The Impact: Developers may fail to verify the bug because they can’t reproduce it, leading to delays in resolution. 

3. Incorrect or Missing Metadata 

  • The Problem: Metadata, such as environment information (operating system, browser, app version), is crucial for understanding where the bug occurs. Omitting it makes debugging far more difficult. 
  • The Impact: A bug may seem “fixed” on one browser but remain broken on another, simply because the needed context wasn’t included. 

4. Wrong Prioritization or Severity Levels 

  • The Problem: Assigning incorrect priority or severity levels can confuse developers. For instance, labeling a minor UI bug as “Critical” wastes resources, while overlooking critical bugs can lead to serious launch issues. 
  • The Impact: Skewed prioritization hampers the development team's ability to focus on the most pressing issues first. 

5. Attaching Overwhelming or Irrelevant Details 

  • The Problem: While it’s important to provide context, attaching unnecessary screenshots, logs, or long-winded descriptions can overwhelm developers. Information overload makes it difficult to zero in on relevant details. 
  • The Impact: Developers spend more time sifting through clutter than solving the actual bug. 

6. Overlooking Expected vs. Actual Results 

  • The Problem: Effective bug reports compare the system's current behavior with what should ideally happen. Bugs that only describe one or the other lack essential context. 
  • The Impact: Developers may not understand how the feature was supposed to behave, leading to incorrect fixes. 

 Actionable Tips to Avoid Bug Reporting Pitfalls 

Avoiding these mistakes isn’t hard if you follow a systematic approach. Here are 6 actionable tips to improve the quality of your bug reports and drive faster resolutions:

1. Be Clear, Concise, and Specific 

To avoid vague bug reports, describe the issue fully but succinctly. 

  • Good Example: “The ‘Submit’ button does not respond when clicked on the checkout page in Chrome (Version 95.0.4638.69) on macOS Monterey (Version 12.6).” 
  • Bad Example: “Button not working.” 

Short, descriptive titles summarizing the issue (“Login Fails with Invalid Token Error”) are also useful for quick reference.

2. Provide Reproducible Steps 

Include clear, numbered steps so developers can recreate the bug. 

  • Example: 
  1. Log in with valid credentials on Chrome browser. 
  2. Navigate to the “Account Settings” page. 
  3. Click the “Change Password” link. 
  4. Enter mismatched passwords and press “Save.” 

3. Include Metadata (Environment Details) 

Always include key context, such as: 

  • Device/OS (e.g., Windows 10, Android 12) 
  • Browser/version (e.g., Chrome 95.0) 
  • App version/build (e.g., v2.3.1-beta) 

Attaching screenshots of environment details can also help when reporting issues. 

4. Set Accurate Prioritization and Severity Levels 

Use consistent metrics to evaluate bugs. For instance:

  • Critical: Crashes, data loss, or errors that prevent the app from functioning. 
  • High: Issues with core functionality. 
  • Low/Trivial: Minor visual/UI discrepancies or typos. 

If you’re unsure, ask a team lead or product owner to validate the severity. 

5. Use Screenshots or Videos Wisely 

Attach visuals when they provide clarity. A screenshot pinpointing an error message or a short video showing hard-to-describe behaviors can provide valuable context. Always annotate screenshots to direct the developer’s focus. 

6. State Expected vs. Actual Results 

Clearly differentiate between how the feature currently behaves and how it should behave. 

  • Example: 
    • Current behavior: “When entering valid credentials, the app returns a ‘Login Failed’ error.” 
    • Expected behavior: “The app should grant access and direct the user to the homepage upon entering valid credentials.” 

 Real-World Impact of Better Bug Reporting 

Improving bug reports doesn’t just make life easier for developers—it speeds up the entire development process. Here’s a real-world example of the difference it can make:

 Ineffective Bug Report:

  • Title: "Search page is broken." 
  • Description: "The search feature is not working." 
  • Result? Developers spend hours reproducing the bug, only to realize it’s isolated to one specific browser version. 

Effective Bug Report:

  • Title: "Search functionality fails on Safari (v15.2)." 
  • Description: "Search results don’t load when keywords are entered in Safari (v15.2) on macOS Monterey. Steps to reproduce include...". 
  • Result? Developers pinpoint the browser incompatibility immediately, saving valuable time. 

Efficient bug reporting leads to faster fixes—and happier dev teams. 

 Boost Efficiency by Mastering Bug Reporting 

Bug reporting doesn’t have to cause headaches. By avoiding common mistakes like vague descriptions and missing metadata, and by following the actionable tips provided here, you can create reports that are efficient, clear, and immensely helpful. 

Remember, great bug reports bridge the gap between QA engineers and developers. Your attention to detail could mean the difference between an unresolved issue and a smooth release. 

Master your bug reporting and empower your team to work smarter—not harder!

Start Using JotGo Today!

Sign up now and get exclusive early access updates ahead of our March 2025 launch.
Try for Free